Most long-distance tourers seem to go for Ortlieb panniers, or one of the numerous imitation brands. They are meant to be tough and waterproof. I decided (as with many things) to try something a little different.
The Super C panniers are made from heavy-duty canvas, which can withstand a fair bit of rain but which is not truly waterproof. However, I decided that it would be advantageous to have panniers which would allow the contents to breathe in the heat and sun, when keeping sweaty clothing and sleeping bags in a watertight bag all day might not be particularly desirable. This paid off in spades as I toured the Middle East and North East Africa, where I saw rain fall just twice in six months of travelling.
To protect my stuff in the event of a downpour or river crossing, I have a waterproof Exped bag liner for each pannier. This gives me the best of both worlds, as I can waterproof items at my discretion, and so far it has worked very well, but after two years the liners have both been patched numerous times with Gaffa Tape, and it is dubious whether they would be effective during total immersion — a river crossing, for example. I would suggest looking for a brand other than Exped, as I am not impressed with the durability of their waterproof bag liners.
I keep my multi-fuel stove and fuel bottle in one of the panniers but on the outside of the liner. This protects the remaining contents of the pannier (my food and cooking equipment) from unexpected fuel leaks, although this has not happened to date.
The canvas is very tough, and has the advantage that if damaged can be patched up easily with a sewing kit. The same cannot be said for the waterproof, plastic-coated-type panniers, which if breached will take a lot more repairing to make them waterproof again. I have heard reports of one pair of these classic Super C panniers being used regularly for over 20 years.
In their current state, they certainly look well-used, as you would expect. After one crash, I found that the front corner of the reinforced base of one panner had come away. The aluminium runner that held the secure plastic rack clamps was also bent a little out of shape after the accident, but it doesn’t seem to have affected the use or stability of the pannier when attached to the rack. One of the two panniers received a small tear which seems to have been growing slowly ever since the incident. This is understandable as I have not managed to find time or motivation to patch it. However, in general, the panniers seem to have taken an awful lot of abuse without any major functional degradation.
The clamps work well to securely attach the panniers to the rack, and are easily removed for transportation. This is probably a good idea to prevent them being damaged, as they do protrude and could be easily damaged if knocked on something. On the back of each pannier, there is also a retainer which can be positioned to latch onto the rack’s tubing. I lost one of these retainers during a bus transit from Istanbul to Antakya, but despite this, the system has held firm.
We also tried the Crosso Dry waterproof panniers, whose hooking attachment system relies on elastic tension to prevent movement. This didn’t always work so well, despite it being much quicker and easier to mount and dismount the panniers, and bumpy tracks would often see the Crosso Dry panniers’ metal hooks slipping off the rack, and sometimes falling off the bike entirely — not ideal. The Carradice Super C’s mounting system is far more secure.
The panniers each have little pockets on the rear side, which are quite small and have loose-fitting lids that are fastened with a plastic pinch-clasp. With the lids open, however, they are just big enough to each accommodate two 1.5-litre water bottles, which is handy. If a few loose items are kept in the bag ends, though, they have a habit of jumping out on bumpy terrain, even with the lid done up and the strap of the lid fully shortened. It’s a minor flaw though — I just keep the contents of these bag ends in an additional plastic bag, or pack them full to prevent movement.
I have to admit that it is convenient to be able to keep a cleaning rag, some chain-lube, a pump, a multi-tool, knife and some snacks in these pockets in easy reach, but without cluttering up my bar bag (which I much prefer to use for easy access to one of the cameras, my diary, map, compass and music player). However, in Egypt I fell foul of my own complacency and had stolen my bike pump and multi-tool while having lunch one day. Needless to say, with Sudan a few days away I had to work hard to find a replacement pump, which was essential, and a subsequent puncture in the middle of the desert reinforced this sentiment! Since then I only keep water bottles in these pockets. I often find myself wishing that they were zipped, or at least fastened more securely.
The panniers are more than big enough for my needs so far, with a rated capacity of 54 litres per pair. The fact that they are made from canvas means that they collect mud and grime far more effectively than the smooth, wipe-clean surface of dry-bag-style panniers. This is great, as I think that the more ramshackle, dirty and travelled I look, the better!
In conclusion, these British-made canvas panniers are very tough, and will last you a very long time if you look after them. They would be ideal as a long-term investment if you plan to make many fair-weather tours over a number of years. They are also suitable for the long-haul, as long as you pair them up with waterproof liners for the wet weather that you’ll doubtless be cycling through at some point during your trip. You’ll then have the advantage of breathable panniers which are hard wearing, easy to repair, secure on the rack, roomy, and can be fully waterproofed. Carradice also make a complementary set of front panniers, if that’s your preferred set-up.
It’s a matter or personal taste and of the predicted weather conditions of your tour, but after two years in a variety of extreme conditions, I have no regrets about my choice.
Ride Earth Rating: 5/5


6 Comments
HMM interesting choice of bags, I agree that totally waterproof is not the way to go!! But canvas while it is strong and can take a beating, also does another thing real well SOAK UP WATER , so you have a dry bag to put inside the canvas bag good, but you still have an outside bag holding a great deal of weight in water.
I would suggest a Cordura bag with a water proof cover , it will do both breath and prevent water from coming in. WITHOUT becoming heavy due to soaking up water.
i would look at a set of Arkel bags
On a couple of occasions in the last two years, the panniers have got so wet as to become saturated. On most occasions when it’s rained all day, they have been water-resistant enough to avoid this. However, given the rarity of these occasions, I would not cite water retention as a factor in the decision to buy them. The weight gain must be well under a kilogram. In any case, I didn’t notice it!
I agree that waterproof covers would be nice if I was on a tour with a lot of wet weather forecast, otherwise they’re not really necessary. From experience.
I have to post this here since you don’t have a post for the Brakes on your current site.
I have to totally disagree with you on your choice of brake ,
SO what are you going to do when you blow a seal on the hydraulic line, break a line or collapse the pads together because you forgot to “not squeeze the lever” you will be up the proverbial creek. you wont find a Hydro line in 90% of were you will be traveling, and if you blow the caliper seals , and dont have the knowledge to fix it what will you do????
i agree disc is the way to go and have done so on my world expedition bike, but i chose the safest way to go and still have 10X’s the stopping power of V brakes, Avid cable Disc no worries about Lines it uses standard cables and housing for V brakes found everywhere , easy to work on and no hydro lines to worry about, they give you all the benefits of disc without the worry
sorry to be so critical but just because a Company Sponsors you doesn’t make it the RIGHT choice. I turned down Sponsorship form a few Because it was not the Right tool for the Job.
Thanks for your comments. It would be good if you could post this on the relevant page itself. I have enabled comments now.
I will reply here then — basically you can hypothesise til the cows come home, but what happens in the real world is what counts. And what’s happened is that we’ve spent two years riding through the worst conditions in the world and had to do nothing but change the pads — once. We set off with these brakes to test their suitability, and it has been proven. I don’t think many round-the-world motorcyclists worry about breaking lines, blowing seals, collapsing the pads, etc — and they *all* use hydraulic disc brakes! Same technology, same companies, same end result — powerful, durable, reliable brakes for year after year.
ditto, on this occasion, it has nothing to do with Magura being a sponsor. The louise brakes are near perfection.
One Trackback
[…] did consider their panniers but they aren’t quite large enough. This was quite a useful review — http://tom.ride-earth.org.uk/article…annier-review/ The problem I’ve found with the Ortlieb is that they are fiddly and a bugger to carry off the bike […]