Mongolia: The Cream Of Adventure Cycle-Touring

In 2006, Andy and I took our mountain-bikes up to Inverness and spent a week riding an off-road route to Fort William, which we had put together from detailed Ordinance Survey maps. We made a lot of mistakes - carrying all of our kit in heavy backpacks, relying for a good night's sleep on a £10 tent from Lidl, and being rather optimistic about our daily distances cycling on hiking trails.

This, my first ever bike trip, was about trial-and-error, climbing the steep learning curve of our inexperience. It was the most fun I'd ever had on a bike, or ever have since.

Until, that is, I took my bike to Mongolia.

The last few weeks of riding have fulfilled the desire that inspired the very conception of Ride Earth - to 'take mountain-biking to it's logical conclusion', as we originally put it. One of the intrinsic attractions of bicycle-travel is the feeling of liberty, to go at your own pace, under your own steam, on a route of your choosing, but in practice you are generally limited to roads or tracks, be they paved or unpaved. Out on the vast steppes of North-East Asia, it is possible to take a bearing to the next settlement and then to quite literally follow the compass.

This rugged, unfenced swathe of mountains and steppe is currently being crossed by the expeditioner Ripley Davenport, who has chosen Mongolia as the venue for "the longest solo and unassisted walk ever completed". Davenport's website talks up his mission in terms of "plung[ing] deep inside the most sparsely populated independent country in the world" and spending 3 months crossing its "ruthless landscape", together with a list of extreme adjectives describing the conditions he'll face. He's got a lot of sponsors and media to keep happy, something that only the most dramatic prose can do.

But from my experience in central and northern Mongolia - lesser in scope and duration than Davenport's - there can't be many places in the world more accessible to the adventure-seeking biker. Yes, I did experience dust-storms, tornadoes, freezing nights, scorching sun, terrible tracks, howling wolves, hail, snow, rain, unrideable swamp, massive climbs and descents, and all that kind of thing. But isn't that the fun of it?

These words might sound extreme. That's what they are - the extremities, the noteworthy moments. Vast swathes of time also passed for which there are no adjectives worth using. When nature sends something interesting your way, you sit out the storm, put on another fleece, don a sunhat, tighten your bolts, keep your waterproofs handy, get off and push, sweat a bit harder; you lap it up, smiling through gritted teeth at the life-affirming exposure to the elements, reminded sharply of the contrast between the mundane and the extraordinary and how the combination of the two constitutes life's seasoning.

Rain coming in

Davenport's decision to attempt his walk 'unassisted' - i.e. taking his entire stockpile of supplies with him - seems to me a little odd, as others have noted. Sparse the population may be, with less than 3 million people inhabiting the 19th-largest country in the world, but what is less often said is that the population is very, very well dispersed. On the steppe, it was a rare occasion indeed that we found ourselves unable to see a ger (yurt) or herd of livestock from wherever we happened to be stood.

Even during the most remote parts of the journey, when we made a conscious effort to leave even the faintest tracks and spent 10 days in the wilderness without seeing any settlements, we spotted at least one vehicle or horseman a day. Davenport could be accused of creating something out of nothing. But then the same accusation could be made of any number of expeditions whose funding hinges on an easily-marketable concept. He will undoubtedly have achieved a great feat of human endurance if he succeeds, so all power to him - but he's not hauling 90 days of food out of necessity, and to portray the whole of Mongolia in those terms is misleading.

In practical terms, help is always close at hand. If in need, the inhabitants of every ger will help out of tradition. Unconditional hospitality amongst nomads was a survival mechanism, and such cultural artifacts die hard. On the few occasions we needed directions or water, we were always accepted without question, and often there would be a cup of tea (with milk!) offered, or maybe a spot of solar-powered satellite TV. Fantasy land of wandering shepherds this most certainly is not.

Herding family in Mongolia

In fact, such is the accepting, uncomplicated attitude of Mongolians to out-of-the-way travellers, bike or otherwise, that I initially mistook it for rudeness, as herders on horseback (or more often on Chinese motorbikes) would often seem to completely ignore our presence on their land. But it wasn't long before I realised that it was the opposite - far from being unfriendly or suspicious, it was a sign that we had been accepted and that there was no need for small-talk. If we needed anything, we soon realised, it was supposed that we would simply come over to the ger and ask. In the end, we never felt more at home.

(Incidentally, I found a tattered guidebook in a hostel when I returned to Ulaan Baatar and made the mistake of flicking through it. The authors had come to the conclusion that it was perfectly OK to knock on a ger door and accept the inevitable invitation to stay as if it were some kind of consumable tourist attraction on offer to anyone who fancied it, and that simply handing over some cash was sufficient justification for doing so. They had even coined the phrase "Ger-to-ger touring". I have an issue with this attitude - while I did knock on the doors of a few gers during the trip, I never did so without an express need for assistance - mainly directions, sometimes water, but never food or a place to sleep. These are things on which you should be self-reliant.)

Route-finding is easy in Mongolia. You begin with the assumption that you can go anywhere. Absolutely anywhere. Then you use common sense. On the steppe, each valley has a variety of tracks traversing it. When one set of ruts gets too deep, the drivers will drive alongside it, thus creating a new track. The result after a few seasons is ten or more sets of tracks going in the same direction, with passing vehicles taking the faintest, shallowest, outermost route. Similar tracks lead from one valley to the next. Sick of these, you turn left or right and ride directly cross-country to your heart's content!

Riding singletrack

Paper maps of Mongolia are accurate when it comes to settlements (the roads and tracks can be completely ignored, however), so all you need is a bearing, a compass, a good judgement of distance and a bit of common sense (and/or a GPS receiver). Contrary to popular misconception, there are hundreds of small towns all over the country, and each one has a handful of shops selling a variety of local and imported produce (including instant noodles), at least one place serving hot food at mealtimes, electricity, and mobile phone reception, including a GPRS connection so you can check your email or update your Twitter status if that's your thing. When we stuck to the routes, we passed a town like this every one or two days.

All of this comes together to make Mongolia an adventure cyclist's paradise. Safe in the knowledge that the 'uninhabited wilderness' is for the most part an illusion, it's possible to explore the stunning landscapes in a huge amount of depth and with unparalleled freedom of movement. With practically no paved roads, you need a strong bike and an affinity for off-road riding, and the willingness to put daily distance aside. (For the record, our longest day was 76km, and our shortest was 12km, with the average hovering between 40 and 50.)

It was with sadness and a few tears that the trip came to an end. A surprise invitation to a family gathering in the middle of a maze of plains and lakes, a short ride to the next town, and it was over. We crammed the bikes and bags into the back of a four-wheel-drive minibus and spent the next two days being thrown around inside it on our way back to Ulaan Baatar. Once there, we secured our train tickets to Moscow and began the important process of digesting the weeks of intense, memorable adventures we'd had in this very special place - a place of huge spaces, skies, silences and hearts.

(Some photos by Andy.)

plunge deep inside the most sparsely populated independent country in the world

This entry was posted in Expedition Log and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

10 Comments

  1. Posted July 3, 2010 at 11:43 | Permalink

    Bravo!

    Really enjoyed fol­low­ing this little chapter in the Ride Earth series. I remem­ber the “logical con­clu­sion” tag line– pos­sibly some­thing that can only be achieved through mul­tiple smal­ler rides rather than a RTW epic?

    We found the Alti­plano in Bolivia a sim­ilar exper­i­ence– get­ting lost for five days off the map, fol­low­ing tracks the plain north of Salar dUy­uni. It was a spe­cial exper­i­ence one that allowed us to indulge the feel­ing of explor­a­tion. Though, we felt we were in the middle of nowhere, and aside from some lla­mas there was little evid­ent means of sub­sist­ance there was still at least a hut every couple of hours and a vil­lage every day– though food was some­times dif­fi­cult to come by.

    Read­ing about your exper­i­ence has made me nos­tal­gic.
    Thanks

  2. Lars Demant
    Posted July 3, 2010 at 17:51 | Permalink

    First…I don’t see Mr. Dav­en­port slag­ging you off or even men­tion­ing you. You seem to have picked up his story just because oth­ers have also dared to rip into him.

    Regard­ing sponsors…It seems you also have your fair share of them. Seems a shame that you should men­tion Mr. Davenport’s line up when you…honestly!
    Just con­trib­ut­ing spon­sors are they? Per­haps Mr. Davenport’s are in the same league…

    Do you know Mr. Dav­en­port? Just a ques­tion. I don’t but would rather check in on both sides of the fence before I take a side.

    …but he’s not haul­ing 90 days of food… How do you know? Do you check in with him every day to weigh in his gear and sup­plies?
    Give evid­ence if you know better…

    Davenport’s decision to attempt his walk ‘unas­sisted’ – i.e. tak­ing his entire stock­pile of sup­plies with him – seems to me a little odd… Why is it odd. It is his choice, his exped­i­tion after all? He’s not the only one that picks this method.

    You also said: I never did so without an express need for assist­ance – mainly dir­ec­tions, some­times water, but never food or a place to sleep. These are things on which you should be self-reliant.)
    So would it be OK if Mr. Dav­en­port did the same?

    Like Mr. Dav­en­port, your also rais­ing money for good causes. You couldn’t credit that though, could you?

    I think it’s funny that he walks, almost the same as you cycle per day, and he’s haul­ing weight, in heat over a mix­ture of terrain.

    Fair do’s , free­dom of speech etc, blah, blah but don’t use another, or anoth­ers exped­i­tion, as a lever to make your­self a bet­ter person.

    I am sure he’d love to read your blog, and com­ment on you, on his return. I’ve just copied this link to his email for you!

    All credit to Mr. Davenport.

    Lars Demant

    • Posted July 3, 2010 at 19:27 | Permalink

      Tom cer­tainly isn’t slag­ging of Mr Dav­en­port. I don’t think sug­gest­ing that he is doing so in the spirit of the adven­tur­ing community.

      Spon­sor­ship has it’s pos­it­ive and neg­at­ive qual­it­ies. Essen­tially spon­sors what to garner as much atten­tion as pos­sible and talk­ing up the exped­i­tion is a way of doing this.

      A big part of an exped­i­tion is the ‘idea’ of it. That idea may not match the ‘ideal’ exper­i­ence or the actual end exper­i­ence. I don’t know what your exper­i­ence of trav­el­ling is but Tom and I spent quite a long time with the idea of cyc­ling around the world play­ing a sig­ni­fic­ant part in our actions, but the idea evolved into some­thing else. How­ever, that’s the nature of an open-ended ever-evolving travel exper­i­ence and fix­ing on a end goal at all costs.

      Tom has some dif­fer­ent opin­ions and approaches born from hav­ing just come back from Mon­go­lia and gathered exper­i­ences and information.

      Each is push­ing their own envel­ope of exper­i­ence and bound­ar­ies. Debate and shar­ing ideas is a very healthy pro­cess to hope­fully even­tu­ally end up with more valu­able and ful­filling exper­i­ences for all parties.

    • Posted July 4, 2010 at 05:11 | Permalink

      Hi Lars, thanks for the comment.

      I cer­tainly wasn’t ‘slag­ging off’ Dav­en­port. I’m sorry if you got that impres­sion. I’ve never met him, no. The point was simply that Mon­go­lia isn’t an unin­hab­ited waste­land for which it is neces­sary to carry com­plete sup­plies for an entire tra­versal, and I wanted to make clear that this is an inac­cur­ate view, but I think a commonly-held one — one which I myself car­ried before I went there.

      I make no judge­ment on his mis­sion in any other terms, just a point about how the place in which he’s doing it is being (in my opin­ion) mis­rep­res­en­ted, and I write about my travels in order to break down cul­tural ste­reo­types, so in this respect, Davenport’s pro­ject is very rel­ev­ant. As I said before — all power to him, and I hope he is suc­cess­ful with his human-endurance mission.

      There is a more gen­eral point here, I think, about the com­prom­ises that ‘pro­fes­sional’ exped­i­tions have to make. I’m lucky enough to have a set of spon­sors who have simply donated pieces of equip­ment to test to destruc­tion for product-development pur­poses, and who are happy enough with that and a logo in the side­bar. Aside from this, I fund my adven­tures out of my own pocket through my own hard work and I don’t have any oblig­a­tions to present my jour­neys in any par­tic­u­lar way.

      A high-profile, sponsor-funded trip comes with a lot of strings attached, not least present­ing the pro­ject in a way that makes the media ‘bite’ so the fin­an­cial back­ers get their money’s worth of expos­ure. It’s a little naive to think that this arrange­ment doesn’t swing the PR in the dir­ec­tion of the dramatic!

      My hope is not to cre­ate con­flict, but to cre­ate bet­ter under­stand­ing, and hope­fully the debate can con­tinue in an intel­li­gent way. Why not have a look at my and Andy’s pho­tos on Flickr, so you can see some of the Mon­go­lia that we exper­i­enced over these last 2 months?

  3. Posted July 3, 2010 at 20:19 | Permalink

    Lars, I feel I have to pitch in here again.

    I think you’re over sens­it­ive to the tone of the post. I’ve been fol­low­ing Ripley’s adven­ture– and quite enjoy­ing it. I never ques­tioned his logic of tow­ing all his food etc. It did cross my mind that he must have to refuse hos­pit­al­ity from time to time, but that, as Mon­go­lia is the waste­land that we assume it is, this wouldn’t be too fre­quent. Tom and Andy’s exper­i­ence of the same place provided an inter­est­ing coun­ter­point; one of an access­ible enjoy­able adven­ture rather than Ripley’s epic push.

    Its import­ant that claims are chal­lenged and ques­tioned and some­times even ridiculed. That’s how we get to the core of the zeit­geist in other fields of endeav­our why not adventure?

    As far as mak­ing a chal­lenge more of a chal­lenge goes– how about walk­ing land’s end to john o groats unas­sisted and un-aided? Sounds a little silly doesn’t it.

    • Posted July 4, 2010 at 05:17 | Permalink

      The final point is a good one — but if someone did walk LEJOG unas­sisted, and wrote about and pho­to­graphed it as if Bri­tain was an unin­hab­ited wil­der­ness (which they could), they would be ridiculed, because every­one knows what Bri­tain is like, right?

      Is there an ele­ment of ‘fuel­ling the ste­reo­type’ here?

  4. Lars Demant
    Posted July 4, 2010 at 13:16 | Permalink

    I did read some­where that Ripley is Lact­ous Intol­er­ant, so any form of diary offered to Ripley would have to be refused — Obvi­ously for med­ical reas­ons.
    I am sure that Ripley is com­mu­nic­at­ing with his Rus­sian lan­guage skills in such a way as to not offend, if he was offered anything.

    Mon­go­li­ans are friendly enough not to take offence and I am sure no major cul­tural bound­ar­ies would be breeched, or Mon­gols offen­ded, if he refused politely.
    He also said in many art­icles that he also fun­ded the entire exped out of his own pocket and moved to a smal­ler house or something.

    All in all, I think he deserves credit for doing some­thing so demand­ing — at the age of 40!
    This morn­ing I read in another forum, that his next desert exped­i­tion in 2011 is at the other end of the spec­trum using four legged beasts and he’s tak­ing stu­dents or some­thing like that?

    Lars

    • Posted July 4, 2010 at 14:47 | Permalink

      Undoubtedly he deserves credit for his under­tak­ing, as a demostra­tion of human strength and determ­in­a­tion, espe­cially if it is self-funded. I’m sure he wouldn’t offend any loc­als either — in my exper­i­ence you’re often accep­ted word­lessly and so left alone as a trav­el­ler; it’s expec­ted in Mon­go­lia that if you need help, you ask for it, rather than invit­a­tions flow­ing from every dir­ec­tion as in some parts of the world!

      Hope­fully this debate, here and else­where, has shed some light on the com­plex­it­ies of com­mu­nic­at­ing the real­ity of these kinds of jour­neys to lay audi­ences. It might just be true in the end that you can’t ima­gine it unless you’ve been there…

  5. Posted July 5, 2010 at 13:38 | Permalink

    Ripley’s cer­tainly caus­ing a few ripples at the moment, isn’t he?

    It’s dif­fi­cult to say any­thing crit­ical without com­ing across as angry/jealous or bash­ing people for the sake of it. But I think you’ve raised an excel­lent point Tom…

    What Mr Davenport’s doing sounds incred­ibly tough and all respect to him for tak­ing on such a chal­lenge. But just as it’s mis­lead­ing to claim that an exped­i­tion has hon­our­able and self-less aims when it’s more about an adven­ture for its own sake, it’s also mis­lead­ing to por­tray a des­tin­a­tion as some­thing that it’s not.

    Hon­esty and open­ness, as ever, are the best policies.

    Thanks for stick­ing to them Tom.

    Tim.

  6. Liz Allen
    Posted July 6, 2010 at 17:20 | Permalink

    Inform­at­ive and enlight­en­ing piece of writ­ing. Very use­ful for folk plan­ning their travels.

    An inter­est­ing debate has ensued too.

2 Trackbacks

  1. […] This post was men­tioned on Twit­ter by Tom / Ride Earth, Trav­el­lingTwo. Trav­el­lingTwo said: Lov­ing this help­ful and inspir­ing tale of adven­ture cyc­ling in Mon­go­lia http://bit.ly/dstV4r from @rideearthtom […]

  2. […] Con­tinue read­ing this art­icle @ Ride Earth […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting